Until then, we give the following explanation:
We are not surprised that you have contacted us; you are not the first
who contact us and will not be the last. You are Confusing of political
tendency with political fraction. We don’t have monolithic conception
of the organization.
asked you to “denounce” the “IFCL”. What we asked you, was, publicly rejection of the
of groups like “IFCL”. Because these
are common to all non-proletarian circles.
It looks like all practice of Klasbatalo has been only
to have links with the “IFCL”! You wrote:
“We would like to know how our practice and our actions
have caused confusion in the PPM simply by virtue of the
fact that we have links with the IFCL.”
Once again because it looks like all practice of Klasbatalo
has been only to have links with the “IFCL”, sectarianism became
its main enemy! You wrote:”Sectarianism is our main enemy”.
Sectarianism is the event not the cause; it is one of the
problems of the Proletarian Political Milieu but not the main
nemy of the Proletarian Political Milieu. Of course, your view
of sectarianism has its roots.
We believe that influence of bourgeois and petty-bourgeois
ideologies is the main enemy not only to the
but also to its political currents. We believe, tireless
duties of internationalists should be to strive to strengthen
the proletarian values and principles.
You never touching about these problems because it looks like you are
not trying to strengthening of the proletarian values and principles.
We believe a serious criticism of the practice of the Klasbatalo, will
not weaken the Klasbatalo, but also will strengthen the Klasbatalo, will
also contribute to the strengthening of the proletarian values and
principles. We comradely urge you to such criticism.
4th December 2011